{"id":3300,"date":"2019-04-14T12:12:53","date_gmt":"2019-04-14T03:12:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/163.180.4.222\/lab\/?p=3300"},"modified":"2019-04-14T12:12:53","modified_gmt":"2019-04-14T03:12:53","slug":"the-nasa-twins-study-a-multidimensional-analysis-of-a-year-long-human-spaceflight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biochemistry.khu.ac.kr\/lab\/?p=3300","title":{"rendered":"The NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

What to expect after a year in space<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Space is the final frontier for understanding how extreme environments affect human physiology. Following twin astronauts, one of which spent a year-long mission on the International Space Station, Garrett-Bakelman\u00a0et al.<\/em>\u00a0examined molecular and physiological traits that may be affected by time in space (see the Perspective by L\u00f6brich and Jeggo). Sequencing the components of whole blood revealed that the length of telomeres, which is important to maintain in dividing cells and may be related to human aging, changed substantially during space flight and again upon return to Earth. Coupled with changes in DNA methylation in immune cells and cardiovascular and cognitive effects, this study provides a basis to assess the hazards of long-term space habitation.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Structured Abstract<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

To date, 559 humans have been flown into space, but long-duration (>300 days) missions are rare (n<\/em>\u00a0= 8 total). Long-duration missions that will take humans to Mars and beyond are planned by public and private entities for the 2020s and 2030s; therefore, comprehensive studies are needed now to assess the impact of long-duration spaceflight on the human body, brain, and overall physiology. The space environment is made harsh and challenging by multiple factors, including confinement, isolation, and exposure to environmental stressors such as microgravity, radiation, and noise. The selection of one of a pair of monozygotic (identical) twin astronauts for NASA\u2019s first 1-year mission enabled us to compare the impact of the spaceflight environment on one twin to the simultaneous impact of the Earth environment on a genetically matched subject.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n

RATIONALE<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The known impacts of the spaceflight environment on human health and performance, physiology, and cellular and molecular processes are numerous and include bone density loss, effects on cognitive performance, microbial shifts, and alterations in gene regulation. However, previous studies collected very limited data, did not integrate simultaneous effects on multiple systems and data types in the same subject, or were restricted to 6-month missions. Measurement of the same variables in an astronaut on a year-long mission and in his Earth-bound twin indicated the biological measures that might be used to determine the effects of spaceflight. Presented here is an integrated longitudinal, multidimensional description of the effects of a 340-day mission onboard the International Space Station.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

RESULTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Physiological, telomeric, transcriptomic, epigenetic, proteomic, metabolomic, immune, microbiomic, cardiovascular, vision-related, and cognitive data were collected over 25 months. Some biological functions were not significantly affected by spaceflight, including the immune response (T cell receptor repertoire) to the first test of a vaccination in flight. However, significant changes in multiple data types were observed in association with the spaceflight period; the majority of these eventually returned to a preflight state within the time period of the study. These included changes in telomere length, gene regulation measured in both epigenetic and transcriptional data, gut microbiome composition, body weight, carotid artery dimensions, subfoveal choroidal thickness and peripapillary total retinal thickness, and serum metabolites. In addition, some factors were significantly affected by the stress of returning to Earth, including inflammation cytokines and immune response gene networks, as well as cognitive performance. For a few measures, persistent changes were observed even after 6 months on Earth, including some genes\u2019 expression levels, increased DNA damage from chromosomal inversions, increased numbers of short telomeres, and attenuated cognitive function.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CONCLUSION<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Given that the majority of the biological and human health variables remained stable, or returned to baseline, after a 340-day space mission, these data suggest that human health can be mostly sustained over this duration of spaceflight. The persistence of the molecular changes (e.g., gene expression) and the extrapolation of the identified risk factors for longer missions (>1 year) remain estimates and should be demonstrated with these measures in future astronauts. Finally, changes described in this study highlight pathways and mechanisms that may be vulnerable to spaceflight and may require safeguards for longer space missions; thus, they serve as a guide for targeted countermeasures or monitoring during future missions.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n
\n