<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Algae found in thermal springs and other extreme environments have heated up a long-standing debate: Do eukaryotes\u2014organisms with a cell nucleus\u2014sometimes get an evolutionary boost in the form of genes transferred from bacteria? The genomes of some red algae, single-celled eukaryotes, suggest the answer is yes. About 1% of their genes have foreign origins, and the borrowed genes may help the algae adapt to their hostile environment.<\/p>\n
The new research, posted last week as a preprint on bioRxiv, has not persuaded the most vocal critic of the idea that eukaryotes regularly receive beneficial bacterial DNA. But other scientists have been won over. The group provides a \u201cfairly nice, rock-solid case for horizontal gene transfer\u201d into eukaryotes, says Andrew Roger, a protist genomicist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada.<\/p>\n
Many genome studies have shown that prokaryotes\u2014bacteria and archaea\u2014liberally swap genes among species, which influences their evolution. The initial sequencing of the human genome suggested our species, too, has picked up microbial genes. But further work demonstrated that such genes found in vertebrate genomes were often contaminants introduced during sequencing.<\/p>\n
In 2015, after analyses of millions of protein sequences across many species, William Martin, a biologist at the University of Dusseldorf (UD) in Germany, and colleagues concluded in\u00a0Nature<\/em>\u00a0that there is no significant ongoing transfer of prokaryotic genes into eukaryotes. Martin believes any such transfers only occurred episodically early in the evolution of eukaryotes, as they internalized the bacteria that eventually became organelles such mitochondria or chloroplasts. If bacterial genes were continually moving into eukaryotes and being put to use, Martin says, a pattern of such gene accumulation should be discernible within the eukaryotic family tree, but there is none.<\/p>\n Debashish Bhattacharya, an evolutionary genomicist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and UD plant biochemist Andreas Weber took a closer look at a possible case of bacteria-to-eukaryote gene transfer that Martin has challenged. The initial sequencing of genomes from two species of red algae called Cyanidiophyceae had indicated that up to 6% of their DNA had a prokaryotic origin. These so-called extremophiles, which live in acidic hot springs and even inside rock, can’t afford to maintain superfluous DNA. They appear to contain only genes needed for survival. \u201cWhen we find a bacterial gene, we know it has an important function or it wouldn’t last\u201d in the genome, Bhattacharya says.<\/p>\n He and Weber turned to a newer technology that deciphers long pieces of DNA. The 13 red algal genomes they studied contain 96 foreign genes, nearly all of them sandwiched between typical algal genes in the DNA sequenced, which makes it unlikely they were accidentally introduced in the lab. \u201cAt the very least, this argument that [putative transferred genes are] all contamination should finally be obsolete,\u201d says Gerald Schoenknecht, a plant physiologist at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater.<\/p>\n The transferred genes seem to transport or detoxify heavy metals, or they help the algae extract nourishment from the environment or cope with high temperature and other stressful conditions. \u201cBy acquiring genes from extremophile prokaryotes, these red algae have adapted to more and more extreme environments,\u201d Schoenknecht says.<\/p>\n Martin says the new evidence doesn’t persuade him. \u201cThey go to great lengths to find exactly what I say they should find if [horizontal gene transfer to eukaryotes] is real, but they do not find it,\u201d he asserts. Others argue that gene transfer to eukaryotes is so rare, and the pressure to get rid of any but the most important borrowed genes is so strong, that transferred genes might not accumulate over time as Martin expects.<\/p>\n Of course, Roger says, \u201cWhat’s happening in red algae might not be happening in animals like us.\u201d Humans and all other multicellular eukaryotes, including plants, have specialized reproductive cells, such as sperm or eggs or their stem cells, and only bacterial genes picked up by those cells could be passed on.<\/p>\n Despite this obstacle, several insect researchers say they see evidence of such gene transfer. John McCutcheon, a biologist at Montana State University in Missoula who studies mealy bugs, is one. \u201cI’ve moved beyond asking \u2018if [the bacterial genes] are there,\u2019 to how they work,\u201d he says. The red algae, he adds, \u201cis a very clear case.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n (\uc6d0\ubb38: \uc5ec\uae30<\/a>\ub97c \ud074\ub9ad\ud558\uc138\uc694~)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"